Naturopathic Medicine Isn’t a Mystery. It’s a Method
Naturopathic Medicine Isn’t a Mystery. It’s a Method
Naturopathic medicine is sometimes described as though it were simply a collection of natural remedies. It is not. At its best, it is a structured approach to clinical decision-making—one that asks not only what can suppress a symptom, but also what is contributing to the problem, what can be changed, and what level of treatment is appropriate.
That structure is called the Therapeutic Order.
The Therapeutic Order begins with the foundations that influence nearly every system in the body: nutrition, movement, sleep, stress, environment, relationships, and other conditions that can either support health or steadily undermine it. From there, the physician may use increasingly targeted interventions—supporting normal physiology, restoring impaired function, using nutritional or botanical therapies, prescribing medication when it is within the physician’s scope, and referring for more intensive care when necessary.
This does not mean that every patient must climb a rigid ladder or that lifestyle advice replaces appropriate medical treatment. A person with a serious infection, acute injury, or medical emergency does not need to “start with sleep.” Clinical urgency always matters. The Therapeutic Order is better understood as a framework for choosing care that is effective, proportionate, and as minimally disruptive as the situation allows.
Treating the Conditions that Shape Health
Much of chronic disease is influenced by multiple interacting factors rather than one isolated cause. Blood pressure, blood sugar, inflammation, cardiovascular risk, mood, pain, and energy can all be affected by sleep, diet, physical activity, stress, medications, social circumstances, and underlying disease.
That is why naturopathic care is often multimodal. The treatment plan may include several coordinated changes rather than one product aimed at one symptom.
In a randomized controlled trial involving 246 Canadian postal workers at increased cardiovascular risk, participants received either enhanced usual care or enhanced usual care plus individualized naturopathic care. After one year, the group receiving naturopathic care had a significantly lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome and a reduced estimated risk of cardiovascular disease. The care primarily involved individualized nutrition and physical-activity counseling, with selected natural health products when appropriate.
That study does not prove that naturopathic medicine prevents every heart attack, nor does it establish the effectiveness of every therapy used by every naturopathic doctor. It does show that a structured, individualized approach addressing modifiable risk factors can produce measurable clinical changes.
The Evidence is Growing– but it is not Finished
A 2019 systematic review examined research on whole-system, multimodality naturopathic care. The authors identified promising evidence in areas including cardiovascular risk, musculoskeletal pain, type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, depression, and anxiety. They also emphasized an important limitation: the research base remains relatively small, and more rigorous, well-designed pragmatic trials are needed.
That is the scientifically honest position. Naturopathic medicine should not be presented as magic, and it should not be exempt from scrutiny. Individual treatments must be evaluated for effectiveness, safety, interactions, appropriate dosing, and relevance to the patient in front of the doctor.
But neither should naturopathic medicine be dismissed as mysterious or unstructured. Its defining strength is not that everything used is “natural.” Its strength is the method: investigate broadly, identify changeable contributors, support healthy function, treat appropriately, monitor outcomes, and escalate or refer when the patient needs more.
Naturopathic medicine isn’t a mystery. It’s a method—one grounded in careful assessment, individualized care, and the disciplined use of the least intensive treatment capable of doing the job.
Research Referenced
- Finnell et al., “Origins of the Therapeutic Order and Implications for Research,” Integrative Medicine, 2019.
- Seely et al., “Naturopathic Medicine for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” CMAJ, 2013.
- Myers et al., “The State of the Evidence for Whole-System, Multi-Modality Naturopathic Medicine,” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2019.
By: Joy Maples, APR | Executive Director, CoAND
Joy Maples is the Executive Director of the Colorado Association of Naturuopathic Doctors . She’s not a doctor of any kind and faints at the sight of blood. But she’s one heck of an administrator.
As Executive Director, she’s a bridge builder. She is the one working to make naturopathic medicine visible, understandable, and useful to people who’ve only known the mainstream healthcare system, which we all agree is stressed.
“I’m a patient, a professional, and an advocate, working to make naturopathic medicine a viable option for preventative care in Colorado’s healthcare landscape. Coloradans deserve options in safely gaining their health and vitality through the care of a registered Colorado Naturopathic Doctor.”

Quick Links
Contact
P.O. Box 1062
Erie, CO 80516
